From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Moe Subject: Re: org-odt: turning off section numbering does not work Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:31:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4E9C5863.5050505@christianmoe.com> References: Reply-To: mail@christianmoe.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44129) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFq3e-00043s-FG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:28:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFq3d-0004JO-4g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:28:58 -0400 Received: from mars.hitrost.net ([91.185.211.18]:33301) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFq3c-00048b-Tv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:28:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mehul Sanghvi Cc: Org Mode Hi, According to this thread, num:nil should work in recent versions of Org: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/46058 It works for me. You might try updating to the most recent version of Org and see if that fixes things. As a one-off fix, in OpenOffice you can turn off the numbering with Tools > Outline Numbering. For each of the three heading levels that are numbered, you need to set Number to None, and delete the dot in Separator After. Yours, Christian On 10/17/11 4:07 PM, Mehul Sanghvi wrote: > I have the following in my org file: > > > #+OPTIONS: toc:nil H:10 num:nil > > > > Yet in my ODT file I get numbered sections: > > 1. Work Experience > > 1.1.1 Company A > > 1.1.2 Company B > > 2. Skills > > 3. Education > > > Am I doing something wrong ? Or is there another option that I am not > aware of ? >