emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
To: Richard G Riley <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com>
Cc: org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Org and Muse
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:00:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E7B9E44-C73E-4B48-BE47-3DCD6E367D3F@science.uva.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0t63ubqlwf.fsf@richardriley.net>


On Apr 21, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Richard G Riley wrote:

>
> I just dug out some old Muse documents I had and am now wondering what
> overlap exists, if any, between Muse and Org. As a committed Org user
> should I migrate these Muse projects to Org projects?  Any thoughts
> appreciated. Possibly I have the wrong end of the stick with regard to
> org publishing and the two should live together?

Hi Richard,

this really depends what you are up to.

If Org does fulfil all the publishing needs you have, and if you have  
recently only used Org for many things, it might be a good thing to  
move old Muse files.  If only to just work in a single environment and  
not having to remember several different ways of writing the ascii  
source.  Much can be achieved these days with rg if your target is  
HTML or LaTeX.

However, if the focus of what you are doing is really document  
creation, publishing, then Muse currently gives you many more options,  
to tweak the final output, to reach different formats etc.

There used to be plans to tweak Muse so that it could digest Org  
syntax, but these plans have died (as far as I know).

There are plans to enhance the export of Org, to allow richer output  
and more export formats, but my estimate is that it will be quite some  
time before these (in the publishing quality sense) would be up to par  
with Muse, if ever.  The focus of Org has so far been less strongly on  
publishing, its syntax is sloppier to facilitate easier note taking,  
but that at the same time makes writing consistent export harder.  Not  
impossible, only harder.  Bastien has worked hard to create a basis  
for a general exporter, so I am sure more will come, eventually.

- Carsten





>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-23 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-21 15:15 Org and Muse Richard G Riley
2008-04-21 19:23 ` Peter Jones
2008-04-23 13:00 ` Carsten Dominik [this message]
2008-04-24  6:53 ` Dmitri Minaev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E7B9E44-C73E-4B48-BE47-3DCD6E367D3F@science.uva.nl \
    --to=dominik@science.uva.nl \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=rileyrgdev@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).