From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc-Oliver Ihm Subject: Re: Possibly new function to view your notes in chronological order Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:11:07 +0200 Message-ID: <4E24854B.1080607@online.de> References: <4E22A556.3010202@online.de> <87ei1ohuf4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49730) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QitHc-0004No-Ju for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:15:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QitHX-0006Vh-AU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:15:11 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:35914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QitHW-0006UB-WF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:15:07 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QitHU-0007UW-OI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:15:04 +0200 Received: from p54a88151.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.168.129.81]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:15:04 +0200 Received: from marc-oliver.ihm by p54a88151.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:15:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ei1ohuf4.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: Marc-Oliver Ihm Hello Bastien ! Thanx for testing ! Currently I think, that this function is most useful, if applied to all org-buffers. So I personally prefer the mulit-occur option, which gives me a list for all of my org-buffers. Therefore I feel a bit ashamed, that this does not work for you :-/ Did you get any errors ? Anything within the *Messages* Buffer ? Is at least an *Occur*-Buffer created ? A guess about a possible cause: I assume that you alread use emacs 24, whereas I still cling to emacs 23. Maybe some details of the contents of the created *Occur*-buffer has changed, which might have broken my code (I found that I need to rely on the contents of the *Occur*-buffer). If you find that such an *Occur*-Buffer is created, when you run my function, would it be possible to send it to me ? Thanx a lot ! with kind regards, Marc-Oliver Ihm Am 18.07.2011 10:20, schrieb Bastien: > Hi Marc-Oliver, > > Marc-Oliver Ihm writes: > >> I would like to submit the new function org-find-timestamps for >> disussion. > > Thanks for this piece of code and for this idea! > > I've tested it a bit and I encourage others to test it. > > I was able to create a sparse tree with inactive timestamps, > but I was not able to display a buffer with ordered items. > I will test more carefully and give feedback/debugging. > > My main reaction is: your idea/code could partially sneak into > `org-sparse-tree' by adding a new ran[g]e option, asking the > starting and ending dates, and creating the sparse tree. > > What do you think? >