From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>
Subject: Re: [babel] using #+call for inline results
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:56:33 +0200
Message-ID: <4E071E71.4060804@christianmoe.com>
References: <87mxhaunsi.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<87mxh9omwb.fsf@gmail.com>	<87mxh9pvz8.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<87sjr1i040.fsf@gmail.com>	<4E030676.3070504@christianmoe.com>
	<87hb7ej1pu.fsf@gmail.com>
Reply-To: mail@christianmoe.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40612)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1Qanvr-0003aH-79
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:55:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1Qanvq-0000uj-72
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:55:19 -0400
Received: from mars.hitrost.net ([91.185.211.18]:19811)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1Qanvq-0000pY-0L
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:55:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87hb7ej1pu.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi, Eric,

Very nice, thanks!

I note the turnover on your long-term low-priority stack is about two 
days.
:)

But I seem to have a problem (running your example):

Debugger entered--Lisp error: (invalid-function (nonempty (a b) (let 
((it (match-string a))) (if (= (length it) 0) (match-string b) it))))
   (nonempty (a b) (let (...) (if ... ... it)))()
   org-babel-lob-get-info()
   org-babel-lob-execute-maybe()
   org-babel-execute-maybe()
   org-babel-execute-safely-maybe()
   run-hook-with-args-until-success(org-babel-execute-safely-maybe)
   org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c(nil)
   call-interactively(org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c nil nil)

Yours,
Christian


On 6/25/11 12:36 AM, Eric Schulte wrote:
> Christian Moe<mail@christianmoe.com>  writes:
>
>> +1 for inline calls. No hurry, though.
>>
>
> I've just pushed up an implementation for inline call blocks, the new
> syntax is described in the documentation but a simple example is below.
>
>      #+source: square
>      #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var it=0
>        (* it it)
>      #+end_src
>
>      Here is a call_square(it=4) stuck in the middle of some prose.
>
> Please let me know how it works and if you have any problems or
> recommendations.
>
> Cheers -- Eric
>