From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Robert Goldman <rpgoldman@sift.info>
Subject: Re: Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 23:46:12 -0500
Message-ID: <4DC8C314.7020106@sift.info>
References: <4DC8A5C5.4050202@sift.info>
	<7319.1304996046@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
	<4DC8A9D5.5090504@sift.info>
	<8460.1305001352@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
Reply-To: rpgoldman@sift.info
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41504)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rpgoldman@sift.info>) id 1QJepu-0006bA-De
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 00:46:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rpgoldman@sift.info>) id 1QJept-0002fo-67
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 00:46:18 -0400
Received: from mpls.sift.info ([75.146.46.193]:43698)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rpgoldman@sift.info>) id 1QJept-0002fi-1a
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 00:46:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8460.1305001352@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On 5/9/11 May 9 -11:22 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Robert Goldman <rpgoldman@sift.info> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/9/11 May 9 -9:54 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
>>> Robert Goldman <rpgoldman@sift.info> wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is the following code block there:
>>>>
>>>> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
>>>>   (add-to-list 'org-export-latex-classes
>>>>           '("per-file-class"
>>>>              "\\documentclass{scrartcl}
>>>>              [NO-DEFAULT-PACKAGES]
>>>>              [EXTRA]"
>>>>              ("\\section{%s}" . "\\section*{%s}")
>>>>              ("\\subsection{%s}" . "\\subsection*{%s}")
>>>>              ("\\subsubsection{%s}" . "\\subsubsection*{%s}")
>>>>              ("\\paragraph{%s}" . "\\paragraph*{%s}")
>>>>              ("\\subparagraph{%s}" . "\\subparagraph*{%s}")))
>>>> #+end_src
>>>>
>>>> Is this still correct?  Or should this be :exports none instead of
>>>> :results silent?
>>>>
>>>
>>> ``:results silent'' works for me and keeps the result from appearing in
>>> the org buffer. I don't think :exports can do that - it can only affect
>>> what's exported.
>>>
>>> Nick
>>
>> I must be doing something wrong then --- I had the :results silent and
>> found the source block in verbatim in my latex export file....  Changing
>> to :exports none made that go away for me.  Maybe that was a
>> coincidence.  I will have to investigate further, I guess.
>>
> 
> No, you are not doing anything wrong: the default :exports value is
> "code", so the code ends up in your export. ``:exports none'' keeps it
> (and any results) from being exported.
> 
> OTOH, try evaluating (C-c C-c) the code block, with and without
> ``:results silent''. There is a behavior difference and *that* difference
> is not affected by how you set :exports.
> 
> Nick

Ah.  I get it now.  But then surely the above IS a bug -- presumably
it's not usual for a person to wish their latex export configuration to
appear, in verbatim block, in their org-generated latex document!

Best,
Robert