From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkb3PFgmF3IEdyemFua2E=?= <radoslawg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Recurring events with ranges broken
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:28:57 +0200
Message-ID: <4DA2C9D9.4020701@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTim-Ba8Eo3uwFqxV4Sm0up2NecscGg@mail.gmail.com>
	<83aafxjj5a.fsf@yahoo.it>
Reply-To: radoslawg@gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42344 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q9DRI-00082s-0O
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 05:29:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <radoslawg@gmail.com>) id 1Q9DQt-0002ND-47
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 05:29:20 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:56450)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <radoslawg@gmail.com>) id 1Q9DQs-0002Mq-Vg
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 05:29:19 -0400
Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so2502436wwi.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 02:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <83aafxjj5a.fsf@yahoo.it>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,
>> recurring ranges with timestamps
>> are not properly recognized in the agenda.
>> This wont work:
>> <2011-04-07 Thu +1w>--<2011-04-20 Wed>
> uh! Has it ever worked ?-)
>
> Could you please give us an idea approximately
> when it was working?
>
> Could you also, please, explain to me what's the
> rationale behind this kind of time range?
> Why do intend to use it?

I'm not sure the intention of the original poster but I'd find that 
feature handy.
This notation would mean: repeat event each week until the date 
2011-04-20 - after that date stop. I know I wanted this in the past and 
it didn't work. Maybe there is other way - I was not motivated enough to 
dig deeper.

Cheers,
   Radek.