From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH][ANN] org-html/org-odt
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:20:34 +0100
Message-ID: <4D876CC2.3070708@christianmoe.com>
References: <811v21sjy9.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87y648sx2a.fsf@gnu.org>	<4D871223.1060004@christianmoe.com>
	<81vczc95wj.fsf@gmail.com>	<4D87314E.3010400@christianmoe.com>
	<81oc54txa4.fsf@gmail.com>
Reply-To: mail@christianmoe.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41234 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1gr1-0005ls-EM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:17:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1Q1gr0-00037P-4F
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:17:10 -0400
Received: from mars.hitrost.net ([91.185.211.18]:51926)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1Q1gqz-00037L-SS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:17:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <81oc54txa4.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi,

I see. Would you like to continue to receive bug reports based on 
byte-compilation, or should I just load the sources for now?

Yours,
Christian

On 3/21/11 2:31 PM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>
> Hello Christian
>
> Thanks for your first bug report. I have the habit of not using
> byte-compilation.
>
> The reason for the crash you have reported is that
> `with-org-html-preserve-paragraph-state' is a macro and some of the
> references to it preceded the definition. As a result the byte compiler
> was mistaken in to thinking that this was a function.
>
> Jambnathan K.
>
>> With a minimal Emacs as per the old instructions, and with one minor
>> change to your test file (`LaTeX:verbatim' -- I don't have dvipng
>> installed), I get this:
>>
>>
>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (invalid-function
>> with-org-html-preserve-paragraph-state)
>>    with-org-html-preserve-paragraph-state(nil)
>>    byte-code("[...THIS LINE DIDN'T COPY-PASTE WELL... CHRISTIAN]
>>    org-do-export(nil nil nil nil nil nil)
>>    (let* ((org-parse-get-callback ...)
>> (org-export-html-special-string-regexps
>> org-export-odt-special-string-regexps)) (org-do-export arg hidden
>> ext-plist to-buffer body-only pub-dir))
>>    org-export-as-odt(nil)
>>    call-interactively(org-export-as-odt)
>>    org-export(nil)
>>    call-interactively(org-export nil nil)
>
>