From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Context-sensitive word count in org mode (elisp)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:02:45 +0100
Message-ID: <4D5CF245.4070503@christianmoe.com>
References: <loom.20110216T044140-839@post.gmane.org>	<4D5B9CA8.5070100@christianmoe.com>
	<loom.20110216T212901-393@post.gmane.org>
Reply-To: mail@christianmoe.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43823 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pq0ex-0000Q0-CP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:00:28 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1Pq0ew-0002i4-2p
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:00:27 -0500
Received: from mars.hitrost.net ([91.185.211.18]:25454)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1Pq0ev-0002XQ-TW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:00:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <loom.20110216T212901-393@post.gmane.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Paul Sexton <psexton@xnet.co.nz>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi,

> I don't agree with changing '(match-end 0)' to '(match-beginning 2)'
> however. For most latex macros, I don't want to count the words inside
> the macro's arguments.

Maybe you're right. I rarely use latex, so I can't think of a use case 
off the top of my head. Default no, optional yes sounds good.

Yours,
Christian