From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>
Subject: Re: Unintended behavior? Links without description
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 13:49:35 +0100
Message-ID: <4D57D35F.7050403@christianmoe.com>
References: <4D19BC26.8030904@christianmoe.com> <87hbc8vr7k.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: mail@christianmoe.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54887 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PobMH-0005si-Lf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 07:47:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1PobLY-0006hh-Sb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 07:46:37 -0500
Received: from mars.hitrost.net ([91.185.211.18]:53756)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1PobLY-0006hO-IZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 07:46:36 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87hbc8vr7k.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>

Hi,

I've sent a patch separately. Please take a hard look at it, since 
org-bbdb.el is a suggested model for people to look at when devising 
custom link types.

Yours,
Christian


On 2/12/11 11:11 PM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Christian Moe<mail@christianmoe.com>  writes:
>
>> I think I've tracked down the problem, but I don't necessarily understand
>> what org-export-normalize-links is supposed to do or what other behaviors
>> depend on this, so I'm not going to submit a patch. If this is now the
>> intended behavior, it will be no problem to rewrite the custom link export
>> definitions to take account of it.
>
> Here again*, I think org-export-normalize-links: various backends will
> decide what to do about having identical [path] and [desc].
>
> I'd welcome a patch making org-bbdb.el a bit more clever about this.
>
> Thanks!
>
> * see my recent email about org-footnote-normalize
>