From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Erik Iverson <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: org-babel, R, and org-babel-open-src-block-result
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 08:55:33 -0600
Message-ID: <4D2C6F65.1040203@ccbr.umn.edu>
References: <AANLkTin7FR+4cY2xFHyAVdgoqZVmr-E=9vRanUPAjoRj@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45057 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PcfUz-0001py-Gx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:47:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>) id 1PcfUy-00037U-8e
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:47:01 -0500
Received: from pegasus.biostat.wisc.edu ([144.92.73.35]:49656)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>) id 1PcfUy-00037C-2u
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:47:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin7FR+4cY2xFHyAVdgoqZVmr-E=9vRanUPAjoRj@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Leo Alekseyev <dnquark@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 01/11/2011 04:22 AM, Leo Alekseyev wrote:
> I recently started using org-babel with R, and so far I think it's
> pretty great!  I'm still getting accustomed to org-babel workflow and
> am playing with available options.  I have a couple of questions:
>
> I noticed that C-c C-o (org-babel-open-src-block-result) always gives
> me an empty *Org-Babel Results* buffer, even if there's output printed
> to #+results section.  Is this a bug?  Am I doing something wrong?
>
> On a similar note, is there an option for the #+ results session to be
> completely suppressed?..  I can see situations where I might simply
> want to send the code to the inferior process and examine the results
> there using :results output :session, or perhaps I'm running the code
> just for the side effects.  It would be nice if I could say e.g.
> :results none.

 From the manual:

The following results options indicate what happens with the results once they 
are collected.

     * silent
The results will be echoed in the minibuffer but will not be inserted into the 
Org-mode buffer. E.g., :results output silent.