From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Elston Subject: Re: MobileOrg and Voice Capturing (Android) Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:43:22 -0800 Message-ID: <4CF8210A.8020705@comcast.net> References: <87fwul463g.fsf@gmx.ch> <4CF46B08.2020200@comcast.net> <87d3plotiv.fsf@gmx.ch> <4CF6FBF0.1090707@comcast.net> <874oawppqa.fsf@gmx.ch> <4CF7F014.7080203@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49321 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1POHsS-0006xf-VL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 17:43:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1POHsR-00068n-Ec for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 17:43:48 -0500 Received: from qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.27.212]:41117) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1POHsR-00068M-6g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 17:43:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Matthew Jones Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Looking forward to it Matthew. Thanks for the hard work. Mark On 12/2/2010 12:41 PM, Matthew Jones wrote: > Mark, you are exactly right about this... I made some good progress on > it last night, I will reply to this thread once I have something > concrete. Would love to get you guys to test and earlier version of it > before I release it to the market with that change. > > http://matburt.net > > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Mark Elston > wrote: >... > Sven, > > Matthew said in an earlier email that he has some work to do > on the Capture activity to make this work. I am not sure what > that work is - it *could* be that there is no Intent filter > for that Activity in the manifest for it to respond to. That > would have the effect you noticed as (I think) both of the > above methods create Intents and send them to the app to start > the Activity. > > But whatever it is you will likely have to wait for him to finish > before this will work. > > Mark