From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre de Buyl Subject: Re: HTML Postamble is inside Content DIV Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 11:28:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4CE89955-F7C1-4708-A149-F60AB482E4DE@ulb.ac.be> References: <80mxj8g0wl.fsf@somewhere.org> <80ei4gdoe7.fsf@somewhere.org> <801uzeu2b6.fsf@somewhere.org> <808vslr5ox.fsf@somewhere.org> <0903D18D-AB13-430D-81EF-93421BDB7D01@ulb.ac.be> <80y60iumbh.fsf@somewhere.org> <8039ih6x7f.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qf7M2-0007gC-1L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 05:28:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qf7Lz-0008B6-UQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 05:28:09 -0400 Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112]:14797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qf7Lz-0008AZ-NB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 05:28:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8039ih6x7f.fsf@somewhere.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Not at all. Pierre Le 8 juil. 11 =E0 09:36, Sebastien Vauban a =E9crit : > Hi Pierre, > > Any objection for applying this patch? > > Pierre de Buyl wrote: >> I checked and indeed "content" is working well. >> >> Pierre >> >> Le 1 juil. 11 =E0 16:06, Sebastien Vauban a =E9crit : >> >>> Hi Pierre, >>> >>> Pierre de Buyl wrote: >>>> Le 28 juin 11 =E0 23:45, Sebastien Vauban a =E9crit : >>>>> Here is thus my proposition for a better div-structured HTML. >>>>> >>>>> There are only four parts required in the HTML for all the =20 >>>>> magic to work >>>>> with the CSS: >>>>> >>>>> - The first part is a container div ("content", by default) =20 >>>>> that surrounds >>>>> everything. >>>>> >>>>> - Inside that are three more parts: >>>>> + a preamble (in a div, if the user wants it), >>>>> + a div "body" and >>>>> + a postamble (in a div, if the user wants it). >>>> >>>> I think my regular use of the html export would be broken. >>> >>> We'll try to solve that, then. >>> >>>> I add a
in the preamble and a
in the =20= >>>> postamble. >>>> This allows me to make a "boxed" page (see >>>> http://homepages.ulb.ac.be/~pdebuyl/ ) which I like. >>>> >>>> If I cannot end my div in the postamble, I think it would break =20 >>>> my setup. >>>> >>>> Here is my setup: >>>> :html-preamble " >>>>
>>>>
>>>> HERE, some static menu items. >>>>
>>>> " >>>> :html-postamble " >>>>
>>>> " >>> >>> Why are you adding a `wrapper' div in the already existing =20 >>> `content' div >>> (that >>> surrounds everything). I see no real difference between both. >>> >>>> I tried without that extra div and I cannot reproduce my former =20 >>>> layout. >>> >>> Would you apply your CSS rule onto `content', would that make a =20 >>> diff? > > Best regards, > Seb > > --=20 > Sebastien Vauban > >