From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id OHVIGQkEgl8+FQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 18:57:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id cDg4FQkEgl9ULwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 18:57:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7564F940142 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 18:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38298 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRK3K-0005v4-Dw for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 14:57:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36794) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRK2s-0005uv-Ff for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 14:56:42 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:45237) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRK2p-0004DQ-7Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 14:56:42 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FCEE2400FC for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 20:56:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.jp; s=2017; t=1602356195; bh=+1iJxiUa9DMDROwuBP7w/XY97TmJRn8gttu0WW0e/84=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=sGX8JIxxVShljf8E5cRSpFSioB4WGfZ82ChBBfYyYsGYOJhEwuLjz/BczEBRq11rt IJFE91vyc+VcwfBKcmVnA+WDzIobrRlcuDjR5Dz16lUoVN0qn+XBzlmx2UMJCV4BA8 9A3w1SaZ76lFB4aYFcOozhcqay2I9CyiyVdtt2FYVwSfwhl+1wzBQUNFyAsiVt+NBY cCraNMxSACWgEaXTsBZi7kP9MsO8Ff6qhYrTByqEVtHJCKrMjhgNbiWJHLJN3SNneD tFFsJGqznYe/qYKuUInu1A0B9L5VDWgUW3eke3S51CDdVg6q+c3OagFbAL+L0O3lR+ VGC+d5ITAo4+Q== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4C7vLB5QFCz9rxL for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 20:56:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 20:56:28 +0200 From: To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: Reply-All noise In-Reply-To: References: <4C7J0z6zLHz6tmH@submission01.posteo.de> <4C7dxx6Vq1z9rxS@submission02.posteo.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <4C7vLB6yRLz9rxH@submission02.posteo.de> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=c.buhtz@posteo.jp; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/10 14:56:36 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.jp header.s=2017 header.b=sGX8JIxx; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.jp; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.21 X-TUID: GsAPpzEAkgAT On 2020-10-10 20:57 Maxim Nikulin wrote: > openssl s_client --starttls sieve -connect posteo.de:sieve > > "IMPLEMENTATION" "Dovecot Pigeonhole" Great! I knew and intensiv used "sieve" on my posteo.de Server. But sieve-Support was unofficial and they simply deactivated it without reason or any news about it. I asked often and also by physical mail to the CEO of the company to turn it on again. But no reaction. I never tried after that. Now you gave the hint that it is activated again. Great. :) I used a nice double-post-on-mailing-list-filter via this sieve file in the past. But my problem was that it was deactivated.