From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Pohlack Subject: Re: Re: skip entry with inherited tags Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:56:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4C693580.6030604@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> References: <20100518074232.GA10524@mteege.de> <4BF2778D.9070702@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <87mxvxdsv7.fsf@fastmail.fm> <4C082225.6020007@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <4C08ED73.1000104@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <4C343FB2.3080204@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <4C3CA546.3060000@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <3BFF4D35-CD16-4A41-B0A4-383538586592@gmail.com> <4C3CCDE4.9000600@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <6694F386-1367-43D6-9587-7F26ECBC9C57@gmail.com> <4C59DDBF.8080105@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46908 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OkzF8-0001NU-Nc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:56:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkzF3-00046t-6w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:56:46 -0400 Received: from os.inf.tu-dresden.de ([141.76.48.99]:60404) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkzF3-00046b-27 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:56:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Carsten, [...] >>> The internal logic of the filter and the preset filter is such that >>> it applies to the entire view, and you should not set in the local >>> options for a command that is part of a block agenda view. >> >> Well, it is already partly there in that local filters are stored in >> text properties for each line. Maybe we can extend this a bit to >> remove >> this limitation? > > I think this will be tidious. Yes, I saw this on my first attempts to look at the code :-). I have not yet given up on this though ... > For block agendas, I guess a skip > condition will be better than filtering. This does not help with inherited tags, AFAIK. For example, if I mark a whole tree of things with :maybe:, the inheriting items in the tree cannot easily be skipped. Cheers, Martin