From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Barton Subject: Re: What license for Worg? Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:34:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4C57E2A7.3030608@manor-farm.org> References: <874ofd19fd.fsf@altern.org> Reply-To: lists@manor-farm.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44852 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OgDtW-0006ZI-NK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 05:34:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgDtV-0000Od-KQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 05:34:46 -0400 Received: from mail.ian-barton.com ([109.74.196.44]:41856 helo=li40-130.members.linode.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgDtV-0000Lg-GE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 05:34:45 -0400 Received: from localhost (mail.wilkesley.org [127.0.0.1]) by li40-130.members.linode.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F8EA3DB for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 09:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from li40-130.members.linode.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.manor-farm.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H7kkO2CeyqGX for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 09:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.133] (unknown [217.146.125.41]) (Authenticated sender: ian@manor-farm.org) by li40-130.members.linode.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AF9FA20C for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 09:34:32 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <874ofd19fd.fsf@altern.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > what is the most suitable license (or licensing scheme) for Worg? > > Here is the best solution I can think of: dual-licensing[1] under the > GNU Free Documentation License 1.3[2] and the Creative Commons BY-SA > 3.0[3] license. This solution would make it possible to take excerpts > from Worg and put them into Org manual for later inclusion in Emacs, > which uses GFDL 1.3 for the Emacs manual. > > Would any Worg contributor have objection to this? > That's fine with me. However, I think you may have to begin the long and tedious task of identifying all contributors to Worg and asking their permission. If this isn't done we may end up with "Free" and "Non free" versions of Worg. Ian.