From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_R=F6hler?= Subject: Re: Re: keys and command name info Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:53:59 +0200 Message-ID: <4C546337.4000500@easy-emacs.de> References: <4C5086C1.9060000@easy-emacs.de> <87zkxa7pmo.fsf@member.fsf.org> <4C518664.4040506@easy-emacs.de> <8762zw117q.fsf@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48997 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfGHo-0002lQ-Mt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:55:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfGHn-0006cF-FG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:55:52 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:51898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfGHn-0006bf-3L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:55:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8762zw117q.fsf@altern.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode Am 31.07.2010 10:53, schrieb Bastien: > Hi Andreas, > > Andreas Röhler writes: > >> Please not I signed the FSF-disclaimer but not the paper transferring >> copyright under US-law. > > Are you willing to sign those paper? > > That would help, because the patch is more than 10 lines... > Hi Bastien, please permit pointing at the silliness of such approaches, which state a creative work starts upward from 10 lines. No single haiku will ever have a change to be protected by that famous US-copyright law. I'm against spreading stupidity over the world and see with sorrow people abiding to it. It's quite the opposite of freedoms GPL promises BTW. Beside: Writing a programs name at the side of it's key will remain a trivial change even if this triviality is repeated. So don't be afraid, if I refuse to sign which I think it's wrong from bottom up. It remains a trivial change, sure. Andreas > Thanks for your help, >