From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Pohlack Subject: Re: Re: skip entry with inherited tags Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:34:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4C3CCDE4.9000600@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> References: <20100518074232.GA10524@mteege.de> <4BF2778D.9070702@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <87mxvxdsv7.fsf@fastmail.fm> <4C082225.6020007@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <4C08ED73.1000104@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <4C343FB2.3080204@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <4C3CA546.3060000@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <3BFF4D35-CD16-4A41-B0A4-383538586592@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46996 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYmBp-0007VK-GB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:34:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYmBn-0003Ns-SM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:34:53 -0400 Received: from os.inf.tu-dresden.de ([141.76.48.99]:39726) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYmBn-0003Nc-Eu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:34:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3BFF4D35-CD16-4A41-B0A4-383538586592@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Carsten and Matt, On 13.07.2010 20:48, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Jul 13, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Martin Pohlack wrote: >> Hard to respond to this vague situation :-). >> >> It would be great if you could point me at more specific situations >> that >> might break or if others could test the patch. I have been using it >> for >> more than a month now without problems. > > The specific one I meant is if you use r or g to rebuild the agenda, > if you do something like a refile command which does an automatic > rebuild, > do you get back the view you expected? Yes, I regularly use 'r'. It works for me. Refiling a single entry did not show a problem. > Also, if you apply other filter commands, either with "/", or narrowing > the filter with "/", does that give the expected results while you are > in your block agenda? I quickly applied a tag filter using '/' 'tab'. Only the relevant entries were shown. Some block agendas become empty as expected. Clearing the filter restores the expected full view. I am not entirely sure that the patch does not have problems though. Matt: could you give the patch a quick test at your end? >>> I will only be able to study this more closely after the release. >> >> Take your time, I will wait for more details to emerge or feedback >> from >> other testers. >> >> One more note here: The current situation for block agendas is a bit >> problematic as their limitations are not documented afaik. >> >> Writing custom agendas is not easy in itself. If things don't work, >> it >> is really hard to distinguish between driver errors and limitations of >> the block agendas. > > Do you have suggestions on how to improve the situation? * Well, the best thing to do would be to remove the limitations of the block agendas, obviously :-), which I hope this patch does. * The second best thing is to document them. I am aware of this tag filter limitation, but no others from the top of my head. Do others know more? Cheers, Martin