From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Elston Subject: Re: Re: Bug: LaTeX export and LaTeX environment Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:20:16 -0700 Message-ID: <4BF439F0.3030307@comcast.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52240 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OEopb-0004AT-Vl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:21:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEopa-0001V9-Ah for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:21:27 -0400 Received: from qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.17]:33014) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEopa-0001Nz-1O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:21:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Ulf, Carsten, On 5/19/2010 12:27 AM, Ulf Stegemann wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> On May 19, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Ulf Stegemann wrote: >> >>> ... >>> the LaTeX exporter seems to cease to work when encountering a LaTeX >>> environment. >> >> it has always been like this, >> >> check out this entire thread for work-arounds and other solutions >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/12977 > > I must have been blind, thanks for the pointer! It works like a charm > with org-special-blocks. > > Ulf I have not looked into the contrib directory lately (for quite a while, actually) so was not aware of the org-special-blocks stuff. This is pretty cool and *almost* what I was about to ask for as well. The only problem I have with it is I need (for specific environments) to pass a parameter to the \begin{xxx} call on latex export. I think what is there is a more than adequate basis for what I am looking to do and I will add my stuff to it and try it out. My question is: Is there a preferred way of doing this? I can do a local enhancement that hard-codes what I am trying to do but would prefer to do this is a more open-ended (even elegant) way. At the end of the day it simply has to work. But I would prefer doing it "right." :) Mark