Re: Poll: Who is using these commands

[Scott Randby <srandby@gmail.com>]

On 05/09/2010 07:43 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2010, at 12:03 AM, Scott Randby wrote:
>
>> On 05/08/2010 04:22 PM, Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>> Carsten Dominik schrieb:
>>>> I am wondering:
>>>>
>>>> How many of your are using these keys
>>>>
>>>> C-c C-f
>>>> C-c C-b
>>>> C-c C-n
>>>> C-c C-p
>>>
>>> Never. I always use the speed commands since they became available.
>>
>> The problem I have with speed commands is that, according to the
>> manual, they only work "when the cursor is at the beginning of a
>> headline." I need commands that work when the cursor is anywhere on
>> the headline.
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> what do you think about C-M-f, C-M-b, C-M-n, C-M-p as alternative bindings?
> These seem to make *a lot* of sense, because, as many here have pointed
> out,
> they are so much better repeatable (Keep C-M- down, press the character.)
>
> - Carsten

If you want to go with these, then C-c C-u and C-c C-j should also be changed. However, I am concerned that C-M-f, C-M-b, C-M-n, C-M-p, C-M-u, and C-M-j are already bound to other useful functions. I don't use these functions myself, but after looking over what they do, I can see that changing these bindings might interfere with the work of some.

Scott