From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Pohlack Subject: Re: Flyspell highlighting (again) Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:50:41 +0200 Message-ID: <4BBB8281.3060107@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> References: <20100406170521.GB9521@edgar.terramar.selidor.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NzDrO-0001iK-EB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:50:50 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53853 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzDrL-0001gW-47 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:50:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzDrJ-0005rw-89 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:50:47 -0400 Received: from os.inf.tu-dresden.de ([141.76.48.99]:50840) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzDrJ-0005re-1k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:50:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100406170521.GB9521@edgar.terramar.selidor.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ivan Vilata i Balaguer Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 06.04.2010 19:05, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote: > Here Matthew Lundin reported Flyspell highlighting URL components: > http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg14029.html > > The issue should be fixed according to the thread, but URLs like > http://example.com/foo_blarghaa still cause problems ("blarghaa" is > highlighted by Flyspell). > > For the wishlist, it'd also be nice to exclude "#+FOO" options from > flyspelling, since they tend to get highlighted when writing non-English text. I'm also seeing my todo states highlighted whenever they are invalid words (TODO, PROJ, CONT, etc.). Would this also be the place to exclude those? Cheers, Martin