From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Elston Subject: Re: Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:41:01 -0700 Message-ID: <4BB3973D.3090305@comcast.net> References: <86sk7gooh2.fsf@portan.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> <3E3E058D-6BBD-4D9B-845D-3E13235EF0DC@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nx2rQ-0001D6-It for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:41:52 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48331 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nx2rN-00016N-9a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:41:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nx2qv-0004wz-PE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:41:23 -0400 Received: from qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.56]:55719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nx2qv-0004wU-Fh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:41:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3E3E058D-6BBD-4D9B-845D-3E13235EF0DC@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 3/31/2010 5:35 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Mar 31, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Chris Gray wrote: > >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * =org-export-latex-classes= no longer should be customized for packages >> ... >>> So if you have customized this variable, please remove once more >>> (hopefully for the last time) your customization, so that it can >>> revert to its now much simpler default value. Put all your >>> package definitions into org-export-latex-packages-alist. >>> I hope this works, and we will not get conflicts because of the >>> sequence in which packages are called. If there are problems, >>> please let me know so that we can find a solution. >> >> Is it sufficient to change the variable that is being set from >> org-export-latex-classes to org-export-latex-default-packages-alist? Or >> does the format of the list change at all? > > org-export-latex-default-packages-alist has the same format as > org-export-latex-pakcages-alist. And I am filling > org-export-latex-default-packages-alist already with the correct set of > default packages, so you should not touch that variable. > > Only if you have previously customized org-export-latex-classes in order > to add more usepackage statements, then you should remove your > customization of that variable and list your set of additional packages > in org-export-latex-packages-alist instead. > > Am I making sense? > So, org-export-latex-classes will no longer be used to define LaTeX_CLASS classes? Instead these classes will be defined in org-export-latex-default-packages-alist? The problem is mainly nomenclature, I guess, but my LaTeX_CLASS definitions are usually a *lot* more than a list of packages. It seems a little odd, but OK. Mark