From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Brand Subject: spreadsheet: column width behavior(s) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:53:40 +0100 Message-ID: <4BABBF44.5020803@alumni.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nut9N-0003xy-OZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:55:29 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56407 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nut9K-0003wd-3O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:55:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nut7d-0001pM-9L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:53:43 -0400 Received: from mail01.solnet.ch ([212.101.4.135]:58267) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nut7d-0001ov-3l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:53:41 -0400 Received: from mail01.solnet.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail01.solnet.ch [127.0.0.1]) (SolNet-Check, port 10024) with LMTP id Lo-KsZIJ5RoA for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.202] (212-41-107-205.adsl.solnet.ch [212.41.107.205]) by mail01.solnet.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 52B764BCB4 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:53:36 +0000 (UTC) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org Mode Hi Carsten, hi all Are there reasons to only narrow but not to widen columns? I would like the behavior `fixed width' like | year | boss | facility management assistant | | | <30> | <30> | |------+-------------------------------+--------------------------------| | 2009 | Alice | Bob | but with the current implementation get | year | boss | facility management assistant | | | <30> | <30> | |------+-------+-------------------------------| | 2009 | Alice | Bob | which widens the column only if there is too less space left for the column content. As a comparison I can imagine four variants: <..40> : `maximum width' (what <40> is today) <30> : `fixed width' <20..> : `minimum width' (no narrowing) <20..40> : `width range' (minimum 20, up to 40, narrowing if even longer) The most commonly used spreadsheet applications offer just one single variant out of the above four (right?) and it is `fixed width'. My vote for org-table would be the same: That it should support `fixed width' and that this is sufficient as the only variant. What is the opinion of other users? - Michael