From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cian OConnor Subject: Re: Re: Vertical split in Emacs 23 Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:35:11 +0100 Message-ID: <4A5EE63F.7020000@gmail.com> References: <87tz1dsulc.fsf@gmail.com> <87vdltom3d.fsf@in-ulm.de> <87skgxf5wz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MRMSL-0002va-9K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:36:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MRMSG-0002ur-LK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:36:44 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58200 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MRMSG-0002uo-IF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:36:40 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f217.google.com ([209.85.219.217]:63886) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MRMSG-0002A7-4B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:36:40 -0400 Received: by ewy17 with SMTP id 17so5199193ewy.42 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:36:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87skgxf5wz.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Add the following to your .emacs file: (setq split-width-threshold 999) I actually like the change, but then I'm using a widescreen monitor where it makes more sense. Paul Mead wrote: > Benjamin Andresen writes: > > >> Hey Paul, >> >> I don't know if this will exactly revert it back to the previous >> behavior, but if you change `split-width-threshold' to a bigger number >> (e.g. 999) than the default it should be more sensible looking. >> >> br, >> benny >> > > Thanks Benny, that'll get me going for now. > > Having thought about this a bit more, I can see where the new behaviour > might be useful, but it just looks a bit ugly in org-mode because (I > guess) it's not been written to deal with narrower buffers. > > Would this be a minor fix or a major change do you think? My elisp is > about as competent as my sanskrit I'm afraid... > > Paul > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode >