From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Slow movement in large buffers Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:39:45 +0100 Message-ID: <4A4A7CB8-1198-4B95-A8C1-AD594AEE7E34@gmail.com> References: <87d3ltjc8x.fsf@fastmail.fm> <17242340-A14F-495A-B144-20C96D52B620@gmail.com> <7205.1300198547@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <871v28tm9u.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38236 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzYDn-0004dJ-Nw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:39:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzYDm-0002Hj-AG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:39:51 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:41555) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzYDm-0002HU-3f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:39:50 -0400 Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so857583wwc.30 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:39:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871v28tm9u.fsf@fastmail.fm> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Matt Lundin Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, Org Mode On 15.3.2011, at 16:51, Matt Lundin wrote: > Nick Dokos writes: > >> FWIW, I opened org-issues.org and followed Matt's lead: at first, I got >> almost instant response going from Other to Closed (using arrow-down) >> and a slight hesitation (< 0.5s) going from Other to the previous >> headline (Development Tasks). After noodling around for a while >> (including the motions that Eric F. suggested and getting no delays >> there), I tried it again and could discern no delay going either >> way. And I do run flyspell in org buffers. >> >> This is on a fairly recent vintage laptop with an i7 quad core processor >> (2.67GHz) and 4G of memory. That probably explains some of the difference >> I see. Matt, what kind of hardware are you using? > > Yes, hardware is indeed a factor here. I'm using a dual-core Atom processor > with 2GB of memory. Well, it should not be a hardware issue to move the cursor down a line. - Carsten > > Matt