From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Riley <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: export and containers
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:16:15 +0100
Message-ID: <49ac84e1.0405560a.1fdd.2c8d@mx.google.com>
References: <49a91200.1438560a.6867.ffffb3e4@mx.google.com>
	<87eixikd1u.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ>
	<49ab92ef.0407560a.4681.543e@mx.google.com>
	<87vdqsz31c.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ>
	<95B3F1B7-98EE-4831-9FB3-1B7D34598061@uva.nl>
	<87iqmsyw4o.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ>
	<3B159DE3-C418-41C8-9422-E0743D789E2E@uva.nl>
	<87r61f7w3r.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ>
	<8296CDBB-B545-4819-99A5-58EDD20DC7DC@uva.nl>
	<49ac219e.0305560a.1bac.ffffac65@mx.google.com>
	<87d4czoisi.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ>
	<49ac3fff.0305560a.5cac.ffffede6@mx.google.com>
	<87zlg3mnr2.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LeJF6-0005wP-TT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:16:20 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LeJF5-0005wD-UB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:16:20 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52652 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LeJF5-0005wA-QX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:16:19 -0500
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:37171)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com>) id 1LeJF5-0006ZW-F7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:16:19 -0500
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so15653fgb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:16:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87zlg3mnr2.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> (Sebastian Rose's message
	of "Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:52:17 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>
Cc: org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Richard Riley <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com>

Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de> writes:

> Richard Riley <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com> writes:
>> Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de> writes:
>>
>>> Richard Riley <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com> writes:
>>>> I really dont see the plethora of sec-id# that are currently generated
>>>> being really useful since they change on each export if new stuff is
>>>> entered. This make existing CSS redundant unfortunately.
>>>
>>> The IDs in the section headings are not meant for CSS styling. That's
>>> what the classes are for.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>
>> IDs are frequently used for styling as well as classes.
>
>
> Well, in this case, since we never know the ID of a section in
> advance... 

Or haven't known in the past. See other post. We probably need to be
able to control the class and/or ID of individual sections at the higher
level.