From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Riley Subject: Re: export and containers Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:22:22 +0100 Message-ID: <49ac3fff.0305560a.5cac.ffffede6@mx.google.com> References: <49a91200.1438560a.6867.ffffb3e4@mx.google.com> <87eixikd1u.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <49ab92ef.0407560a.4681.543e@mx.google.com> <87vdqsz31c.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <95B3F1B7-98EE-4831-9FB3-1B7D34598061@uva.nl> <87iqmsyw4o.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <3B159DE3-C418-41C8-9422-E0743D789E2E@uva.nl> <87r61f7w3r.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <8296CDBB-B545-4819-99A5-58EDD20DC7DC@uva.nl> <49ac219e.0305560a.1bac.ffffac65@mx.google.com> <87d4czoisi.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LeEei-0003zG-RR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:22:28 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LeEeh-0003yr-FS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:22:28 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43518 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LeEeh-0003yh-8S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:22:27 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]:64977) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LeEeg-0000oJ-NK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:22:27 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so984025fgb.30 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:22:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87d4czoisi.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> (Sebastian Rose's message of "Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:56:29 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastian Rose Cc: org-mode , Richard Riley Sebastian Rose writes: > Richard Riley writes: >> I really dont see the plethora of sec-id# that are currently generated >> being really useful since they change on each export if new stuff is >> entered. This make existing CSS redundant unfortunately. > > The IDs in the section headings are not meant for CSS styling. That's > what the classes are for. > > > Regards, IDs are frequently used for styling as well as classes. -- important and urgent problems of the technology of today are no longer the satisfactions of the primary needs or of archetypal wishes, but the reparation of the evils and damages by the technology of yesterday. ~Dennis Gabor, Innovations: Scientific, Technological and Social, 1970