From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Riley Subject: Re: export and containers Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:03:58 +0100 Message-ID: <49ab92ef.0407560a.4681.543e@mx.google.com> References: <49a91200.1438560a.6867.ffffb3e4@mx.google.com> <87eixikd1u.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Le38B-0006hf-MD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:04:07 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Le389-0006e1-VR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:04:07 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57138 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Le389-0006dq-MT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:04:05 -0500 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:13948) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Le388-000349-V3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:04:05 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.218.172]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Le387-0007Os-3Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:04:03 -0500 Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so1818551bwz.42 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:04:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87eixikd1u.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> (Sebastian Rose's message of "Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:37:17 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastian Rose Cc: org-mode , Richard Riley Sebastian Rose writes: > Richard Riley writes: >> It's been a while since I've looked at my org set up. One thing that >> always struck me as a bit hacky was my use of >> >> :preamble "
>> >> and the corresponding postamble to enclose the exported web pages into a >> "container" div. Is there a better way to do this? I would think it >> would be a common enough need that by default or via an option all html >> should be enclosed in a "webcontainer" ID. > > While one container around everything makes it possible to center the > page horizontally, two containers make it possible to center the page > vertically as well. > > If we would go and change the structure once again, I'd even suggest the > following: > > >
-- center the page if desired >
-- center the page if desired Why always IDs as opposed to classes? Can css selectors select based on a part of a name? If not then there is no link between column-1 and column-2. e.g in this convention how does one create a common style for all columns or all "sec-" objects? > >
-- Help with fixed TOC >
> the toc >
>
> >
-- Help with fixed TOC > All the rest of the content goes here >
> >
> postamble >
> >
>
> > > > > Having two boxes for the TOC would make the fixed TOC work in IE. In > general, I prefere to use two kinds of Boxes: > > - one for positioning, floating and so on. This one should have _no_ > padding or margin at all! Can one not simply use .body for that? > - one for margin, padding, styling. > > I found, this is the only way to reliably enforce a layout across > browsers. > > > column-1 and column-2 are for that very reason. All we can do to put the > TOC to the left or right is, to add margins to the body or the level 1 > contents, and place it there. This is, what causes the problems with the > fixed TOC in IE. `column-1' and `column-2' (and `postamble') make it > possible, to adjust the layout in various common ways. > > The `percent-50' (oh what a name) and `wrap' are just there, to be able > to center the whole page horizontally _and_ veritcally. > > > Best, > > -- > Sebastian Rose, EMMA STIL - mediendesign, Niemeyerstr.6, 30449 Hannover > Tel.: +49 (0)511 - 36 58 472 > Fax: +49 (0)1805 - 233633 - 11044 > mobil: +49 (0)173 - 83 93 417 > Http: www.emma-stil.de > -- important and urgent problems of the technology of today are no longer the satisfactions of the primary needs or of archetypal wishes, but the reparation of the evils and damages by the technology of yesterday. ~Dennis Gabor, Innovations: Scientific, Technological and Social, 1970