From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Hide drawers in indirect buffers? Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:26:11 +0200 Message-ID: <4994880E-94A5-488D-B064-C83AAE374D99@gmail.com> References: <4A75B771-BB5D-4245-BC36-94CF1E153C17@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFOrD-0002db-F9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:26:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFOrC-0001eh-54 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:26:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:41339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFOrB-0001ea-UM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:26:18 -0400 Received: by wyg34 with SMTP id 34so1252284wyg.0 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 04:26:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Dave Abrahams Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 4.10.2011, at 17:22, Dave Abrahams wrote: > > on Tue Oct 04 2011, Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> On Oct 2, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote: >> >>> >>> on Sat Oct 01 2011, Dave Abrahams wrote: >>> >>>> When I initially request an indirect buffer for an item (especially from >>>> the agenda) it shows up with all its drawers open. I'd prefer it if >>>> they were closed by default. Is there a way to do that? >>> >>> To follow up my own post... >>> >>> This is actually very surprising, because the entry shows up in a state >>> that can't be reached by tabbing on its headline, with all the drawers >>> open. If you run (org-show-entry) in the indirect buffer it goes into a >>> less-noisy configuration. >> >> This is indeed a bug, fixed now. > > Thanks. So, just for my education, can you explain why running > `org-cycle-hook 'all' is superior to just `org-show-entry' (which was my > workaround)? Because this would also show, for example, archived trees etc. - Carsten > > -- > Dave Abrahams > BoostPro Computing > http://www.boostpro.com