From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Error building org-e-publish Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:11:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4919.1358201480@alphaville> References: <50F33C33.1080607@no8wireless.co.nz> <87sj64xxi0.fsf@adboyd.com> <4083.1358198311@alphaville> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TusFc-00018x-Fd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:11:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TusFX-0006rO-CJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:11:28 -0500 Received: from g4t0015.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.18]:15335) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TusFX-0006rJ-70 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:11:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message from Michael Gauland of "Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:51:22 GMT." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Michael Gauland Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Michael Gauland wrote: > Nick Dokos hp.com> writes: > > > Not sure why emacs24 does not complain but org-e-publish contains this bit of > > code: > > ,---- > > | ... > > | (org-export-async-start 'ignore > > | `(let ((org-e-publish-use-timestamps-flag > > | (if ',force nil ,org-e-publish-use-timestamps-flag))) > > | (org-e-publish-projects ',project-alist))) > > | ... > > `---- > > > > and org-export-async-start in contrib/lisp/org-export.el says: > > > > ,---- > > | (defmacro org-export-async-start (fun &rest body) > > | "Call function FUN on the results returned by BODY evaluation. > > | ... > > `---- > > > > so there does seem to be a mismatch. > > Thanks, Nick. If I change 'ignore to ignore (without the tick), it builds for me > on both systems. > Not sure I understand. Can you explain why that would be a good fix? Thanks, Nick