From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Otterson Subject: protecting ascii art Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:54:27 -0700 Message-ID: <48A5FB13.9@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KU7Fg-0007y7-CS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:54:32 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KU7Fg-0007xp-0Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:54:32 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59532 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KU7Ff-0007xk-Ng for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:54:31 -0400 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:47202) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KU7Ff-0000W7-6n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:54:31 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF98158BBB for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:54:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.112] (dsl231-045-034.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.45.34]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDC4525272 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:54:25 -0400 (EDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Is there a way to protect text regions from org mode parsing? When I paste the following under an org mode headline: +-------+ +--------------> future x +----+ |predict| | +-------+ x -->|TDL +--| x |--+-->| | +----+ +-------+ |predict|--> future y | | +----+ | y | y -->|TDL +---------------->| | +----+ +-------+ org mode scrambles it. If I precede each line with a ':', org mode still scrambles it, but less so. Thanks, Scott