From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wanrong Lin Subject: Re: Bug: monthly repeater does not work Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:18:18 -0400 Message-ID: <486172AA.1000802@gmail.com> References: <48617123.4070905@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KBGqI-00006t-N0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:18:26 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KBGqI-00006a-9l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:18:26 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52543 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KBGqI-00006W-6k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:18:26 -0400 Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.152]:46325) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KBGqH-0002DP-QP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:18:26 -0400 Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 34so599958yxf.66 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:18:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48617123.4070905@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I forgot to mention that the ".+1m" and "++1m" repeaters do not work either. Wanrong Wanrong Lin wrote: > Hi, > > I just tried this: > > * TODO Test > SCHEDULED: <2008-06-24 Tue +1m> > > And it does not work, meaning I do not see the item listed in the > agenda of 07-24, 08-24 and etc. DEADLINE won't work either with the > same repeater. > > Can someone confirm that? I saw the above with org-6.05b on Emacs 22.2 > under Windows/Linux. Thanks a lot. > > Assuming the above report is not a false alarm, sometimes I feel a > little bit uneasy after upgrading to a new version because important > feature might be broken and my task may slip under my nose. Would be > nice if there is an automated regression test, but I can imagine it > would be very difficult for an interactive thing like org. > > Wanrong >