From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Extra space between list items in HTML export
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:00:42 -0400
Message-ID: <4858.1347350442@alphaville>
References: <CC73C7A7.245CE%stanton@haas.berkeley.edu>
	<12349.1347324720@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net>
	<87d31tt3sq.fsf@gmail.com>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35417)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1TBLPH-0002BB-U4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:01:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1TBLOp-0001PF-WC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:01:15 -0400
Received: from g4t0014.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.17]:43025)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1TBLOp-0001Oz-Nl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:00:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
	of "Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:00:13 +0530." <87d31tt3sq.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Stanton <stanton@haas.berkeley.edu>, "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> > With Richard's example[fn:1] and the new exporter, we get different
> > behavior with HTML and latex (without the num: option or with num:t):
> >
> > o the second list is unordered in HTML, but enumerated in latex.
> >
> > o we get third level section numbers decorating the list entries in HTML,
> >   but not in latex.
> 
> I think our mails crossed.  This should be fixed.

Oh, indeed - they are consistent now. Thanks!

> Remember, I have not marked HTML and ODT exporters for release.  They
> are marked as alpha only.  What may seems as bugs, could well be
> something that is partially done.

Understood - but there is still the fact that different exporters are
written by different people: they are bound to diverge unless some
energy is expended to keep them in line. I just wanted to emphasize
the importance of consistency (probably preaching to the choir).

Thanks,
Nick