From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Akater Subject: Re: Do not inherit unnumbered property: help needed Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 18:50:31 +0000 Message-ID: <481BE455-C966-461F-85E2-327820D31392@gmail.com> References: <87375dazkk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zi7l9ee7.fsf@gmail.com> <87375cv9os.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <99B32BBF-1EC9-4A57-B69F-8C74955A8E69@gmail.com> <87vai7pktp.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----TBNHG9DUTLR6WPAR48OYDJ2Y1661WM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42911) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eG8CZ-0006aQ-R9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 13:50:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eG8CU-0006NB-Sd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 13:50:51 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]:42133) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eG8CU-0006My-LC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 13:50:46 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 5so10832909wmk.1 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 10:50:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87vai7pktp.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-org list ------TBNHG9DUTLR6WPAR48OYDJ2Y1661WM Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On November 18, 2017 5:18:10 PM GMT+00:00, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > I suggest to write a parse tree filter that does that >change to the tree=2E > I got an impression that UNNUMBERED's children get cut off prior to what u= ser can do, hence writing a simple backend won't help, and I'll have to pat= ch org (ox) source=2E Do you know for sure I'm wrong? That's what I asked f= or originally---which function is responsible for excluding unnumbered's ch= ildren from exported entries=2E ------TBNHG9DUTLR6WPAR48OYDJ2Y1661WM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQI9BAABCgAnIBxBa2F0ZXIgPG51Y2xlYXJzcGFjZUBnbWFpbC5jb20+BQJaEID3 AAoJELK+sWGx7H9Ev1kQAMSF+UnTwJIjsJEBkjgl2LVbU4E2QKSTNq6OGEmTvS2t 1kImiNfdIbk7kh0S7kogoUSCWJKyKemNJcGDP4hmsPPPDZMkXQ9KIzY635eO2tt5 PJsUJ9Ojd528QfKkB00egpP+Lx7VJq1VG44UtLSiBU6RYk2PSiVqkyu5VCg+ecFi 22xqOjrBW4fjztYgYhq7Z5DX0uU1smZd0BZTiYCR0+0LKL4cTEIeqwf3TxUsL0VL OJTMbts4ez1aMWCGjqs8sy2927P1+zs9Z0u3y4+SavoA0s8U5oyrK3i1FxcFA8K/ j6nXBL+OQHAb/2SVGdC95ZowI5+C7lV/YhSYFJ/Xuag8Yy8HyWn/XL12caSRAGyW 0dh46BagNA1bkhIXVH9B0BtKb9C8NAmweZg/nW39/3BLWp/KSUhZd7tA6XEOVCKh wdfqxEBCXHj6ZjjxRLmPScdzTjQfY80KLd7u7Jgv5KxLmchf2rLgSPPsEs3OQCWC fiLpK1/Peszyg91z2AicUWbnXadrn+CFmwan7oYtL8oI6bhiX1yFCmirZIYCTIkg crBRU3J0X694BX3xe6JU8QkNRIBYqOXinsbKpnnmV0N/CLRYlent08FU6HJlRVjz AvEniYAGRtWVv4NyVp0YV6tNF4GXZ2hI4A3yqhb/EaiXoJ1n9UQQGjR+CHnpe9G2 =ZRrL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------TBNHG9DUTLR6WPAR48OYDJ2Y1661WM--