From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: FR: interactive todo creation with remember templates Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:33:48 +0100 Message-ID: <47FDCF18-357C-453E-9157-FB7E11F0DA5D@science.uva.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JI45T-0006Ho-NJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:33:55 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JI45S-0006Hc-2r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:33:54 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JI45R-0006HZ-U3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:33:53 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JI45R-0005k7-Ta for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:33:54 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so330364ugf.48 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:33:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Austin Frank Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Jan 22, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Austin Frank wrote: > Hello again! > > I love all of the options that are available for inclusion in remember > templates. I've got templates for the kinds of tasks I create most > often. But sometimes I find myself saying "man, I wish I could just > tack a %^G onto this template", or something similar. These aren't > task > types that I use often enough to justify giving them their own > templates, but I still want to have access to the features offered in > remember templates. > > Would it be possible to build a single-use remember template through > prompts at the minibuffer? I am not yet convinced about how useful this would be. First of all, "slapping on a %^G" means adding tags. Since you probably have %? in the headline of the template anyway, adding tags is as simple as C-c C-c.... Ahm, no you are right it is not, because we are in a remember buffer after all. Still, just adding % sequences does not really do it because you still need to decide where the info should go. So in the end, it seems to me the the gain will be very minor. Any other opinions? - Carsten