From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wanrong Lin Subject: Re: Bug: repeated task with ++1w does not auto-jump Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:24:04 -0400 Message-ID: <47E7C794.6090909@gmail.com> References: <47E7C18A.2030006@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JdoX8-0005VV-2R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:24:22 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JdoX5-0005VJ-M6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:24:20 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JdoX5-0005VG-Fr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:24:19 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JdoX5-0001Lh-5e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:24:19 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so868598nfh.26 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 08:24:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <47E7C18A.2030006@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode More observations: With a test task like this: * TODO Test SCHEDULED: <2008-03-25 Tue ++1w> If I try to mark it DONE on 2008-03-24, i.e. before the scheduled day, auto-jump does not work either. Wanrong Wanrong Lin wrote: > > Hi, > > With a test task as following: > > * TODO A test > SCHEDULED: <2008-03-24 Mon ++1w> > > If on the scheduled day (today) I do a "C-c C-t" trying to mark it > "DONE", the scheduled time does not jump to the next occurrence. > However, If I change the task to > > * TODO A test > SCHEDULED: <2008-03-23 Sun ++1w> > > and do the same thing (note I am "past due" now), things work without > a problem. > > I am using 5.23a and Emacs 22.1 on Windows. > > Thanks a lot for looking into this. > > Wanrong > >