From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xin Shi Subject: time lag in re-scheduling the item in Agenda buffer Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:48:35 -0500 Message-ID: <47CDD1C3.7050807@cornell.edu> References: <47CDC0CE.7030909@gmail.com> <878x0yp0vy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWfwI-0003vH-31 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:48:50 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWfwG-0003u6-65 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:48:49 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWfwF-0003u2-RU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:48:47 -0500 Received: from granite2.mail.cornell.edu ([128.253.83.142] helo=authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWfwE-0000qO-QP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:48:47 -0500 Received: from [128.84.46.18] (lnx618.lns.cornell.edu [128.84.46.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m24MmZqK008991 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:48:38 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <878x0yp0vy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode mailing list Hi, I'm using the 5.22a version. When I view the agenda in the buffer, I use keyboard C-c C-s to re-schedule some items. It first gives a "nil" in the min-buffer, and after about 2 or 3 seconds gives me the calendar to choose. It looks like slow compared with doing the same thing in the .org file on those items. Are there any reason for that or to make it a little bit faster? Thanks! Xin