From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wanrong Lin Subject: Re: Bug: Invalid face reference Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:19:52 -0500 Message-ID: <47C83EB8.50302@gmail.com> References: <47C5F369.10206@gmail.com> <87wsop6f4p.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <47C617B0.90801@gmail.com> <47C6E374.2050401@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JV8ty-0000K1-Jo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:20:06 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JV8tu-0000Cs-Bf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:20:06 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JV8tu-0000Ca-2E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:20:02 -0500 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.247]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JV8tt-0003sW-Le for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:20:01 -0500 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c25so845466ana.84 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:20:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <47C6E374.2050401@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org More update: In a tag search result buffer, I move the cursor to a tag, and eval (get-text-property (point) 'face), and I get: (org-tag nil). So this "nil" is causing the problem, but I don't know where it is sneaked in. Wanrong > Just some update: > > I called (org-restart-font-lock) function inside my tag search result > buffer, and I can see a new "Invalid face reference: nil [X times]" > message is generated in the "*Messages*" buffer, with "X" keeps > increasing. I have "jit-lock-mode" (Just in time font locking) enabled > in my emacs config, so I guess that ticking "X" number is from the > background font locking process. > > It seems something is wrong with font locking for tags. But this only > happens in tag search result buffer. It does not happen in regular > agenda buffer. > > I don't know how to proceed to pin-point this. Can any of you guys > also reproduce this? Any suggestions? Thank you. > > Wanrong > >