From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: what happened to the #+OPTIONS: \n:t ?
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:44:42 -0400
Message-ID: <4782.1301939082@alphaville.usa.hp.com>
References: <4D99D8E1.4060406@gmail.com>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42908 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q6npX-0004Qa-83
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:44:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1Q6npT-0002FD-TN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:44:47 -0400
Received: from g4t0017.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.20]:48387)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1Q6npT-0002F3-Q0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:44:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from katepano <katepano@gmail.com>
	of "Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:42:41 +0300." <4D99D8E1.4060406@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: katepano <katepano@gmail.com>
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

katepano <katepano@gmail.com> wrote:

> what happen to the #+OPTIONS: \n:t ? we need it back please!!!

Why? what's the use case?

> why it
> does not work????
> 
> By the way nobody responded to my message!!!
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg40104.html
> 
> why? is it a stupid question or it can't be implemented?
> 

[the question in that message is about exporting to a file with a different
file name than the default, in particular consisting partly of a datestamp]

Neither - but it is not the way it works currently. Again, if you can
present a compelling use case, maybe somebody will implement it (but
maybe not). You are always free to implement it yourself.

Nick