From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wanrong Lin <wanrong.lin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Blank lines in literal html
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:08:54 -0500
Message-ID: <475C7586.9010105@gmail.com>
References: <475453D3.30604@gmail.com> <4756FC88.1050701@gmail.com>
	<878x44ekw6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J1VGj-0000Ki-Mq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:09:05 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J1VGh-0000Ii-Te
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:09:05 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1VGh-0000IT-PH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:09:03 -0500
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.183])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <wanrong.lin@gmail.com>) id 1J1VGh-0003sB-4E
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:09:03 -0500
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a73so3467193pye
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:09:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <878x44ekw6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: org-mode list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Bastien wrote:
> Hi Wanrong,
>
> Wanrong Lin <wanrong.lin@gmail.com> writes:
>
>   
>> Finally, I decided to learn some elisp debugging techniques and as a
>> practice, it seems I found the bug and fixed it with this patch (against
>> org.el in 5.16b)
>>
>> @@ -24437,7 +24437,7 @@
>>           (when (re-search-backward
>>              "\\(<p>\\)\\([ \t\r\n]*\\)\\=" (- (point) 100) t)
>>         (setq par (match-string 1))
>> -        (replace-match "\\2\n"))
>> +        (replace-match ""))
>>           (insert line "\n")
>>           (while (and lines
>>               (get-text-property 0 'org-protected (car lines)))
>>
>> I am not completely sure whether this is the right fix, but so far the
>> output looks OK to me.
>>     
>
> Thanks for this.  I think the patch is safe (I'm testing it for two or
> three days now) but I cannot predict it will be in any cases.  I guess
> Carsten will have a better call on this.
>
> (BTW, the issue your raising here concerns the way the HTML code *looks*
> and IMO they are less important than issues regarding the correctness of
> the HTML code... Just a thought.)
>
>   

Thanks for testing. Surely the No.1 priority is to have correct HTML 
syntax. But I think how the page looks comes very close as a second 
priority. After all, we use HTML because we want certain look (and 
better navigation).

Wanrong