From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Moynihan Subject: Re: FR: toggling timestamps active/inactive Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:05:22 +0100 Message-ID: <4714E142.2020805@calicojack.co.uk> References: <20071016141902.GB3018@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IhovM-0001cE-Ir for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:05:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IhovL-0001bB-2s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:05:40 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhovK-0001az-QD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:05:38 -0400 Received: from storm.bpweb.net ([83.223.106.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IhovK-0005wv-Cu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:05:38 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.205] (host-77-97-226-21.static.telewest.net [77.97.226.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by storm.bpweb.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9GG5aau027948 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:05:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20071016141902.GB3018@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode mailing list Adam Spiers wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I > think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and > <>. > > Why? Say I have an event in my diary.org file, and am subsequently > told my presence at the event is no longer necessary. Consequently I > would like to keep it in the file for reference, to track colleagues' > movements or in case my presence is re-required, but I don't want the > event to appear in the agenda. > > By the way, I probably could have coded this in the time it took to > write the mail, but I thought that until I've sent a piece of paper to > the FSF assigning rights for code contributed to org-mode and emacs, > it would be better to let Carsten write it. Is that correct or flawed > thinking? > This seems like a good idea. Another related one occurred to me today (if it's necessary) which is toggling between the two list indicators. e.g. - foo - bar - baz |<-- Point Calling the toggle-list-indicator function at the point will cause the list indicator to change from a - to a + (and vice versa). R.