From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Hannon Subject: Re: Conflict between Org-Mode versions? Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:58:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <458155.87720.qm@web161908.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <617335.71813.qm@web161902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <4433.1303935870@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <252417.15567.qm@web161903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <87zknaej1w.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <790495.34626.qm@web161916.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <6571.1304107112@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFum9-0003m6-4W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:58:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFum1-0000Zy-Dp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:58:57 -0400 Received: from nm29-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com ([98.139.213.166]:36343) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFum1-0000Zs-3G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:58:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6571.1304107112@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: Org-Mode List > From: Nick Dokos [...] >> Heh. Yes, thanks, Eric. I'm not crazy enough to try to bootstrap my way >> through 900+ variables, but that sets the scale of the challenge for me. >> > IIRC, Carsten had run a poll for the nomination of the 50 most-use{d|ful} > variables. The results must be somewhere (Worg? Mailing list?). That would > probably serve as a better starting point than a 931-element list with no > other indicator of importance. > Also, Bernt's document (http://doc.norang.ca/org-mode.html ) probably > contains settings for most (if not all) of the important variables. That's a very useful link. Thanks, Nick. > After that, you can start looking at more obscure ones. Many of those > were introduced as part of a user-requested feature, so you can probably > get some background information on them by searching the mailing list. >> [...]I note that by my count there are no fewer than 1612 "org*" >> functions ;-) > Be ready to explain them all by heart. Quiz tomorrow. Umm, snow day? Field trip? Wait, feel my forehead! -- Mike