From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: GFDL Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 06:43:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4564DE9E-7D70-4609-B23D-99738C32FF40@gmail.com> References: <878v5wwr96.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <6D1B3E63-A3F0-447E-A1F4-12F8B3156DB9@gmail.com> <513BD73C.3050704@gmail.com> <58FF2382-A0A8-47E2-BEA0-8E88542C6638@gmail.com> <7wbo85qh62.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <87vc6ceigf.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86ppwkij9r.fsf@somewhere.org> <86r4h0h2y8.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <1B9EEC55-EB84-480D-8EEE-8CFAB14D6264@gmail.com> <86mwrogytc.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uf0uE-0004FW-0i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 00:44:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uf0u9-0001T0-EX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 00:44:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]:59762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uf0u9-0001Su-7U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 00:44:01 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hq7so797765wib.12 for ; Tue, 21 May 2013 21:44:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86mwrogytc.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Pinard?= Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 21.5.2013, at 17:03, Fran=E7ois Pinard = wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: >=20 >> I am curious, what passage does make such restrictions possible, and >> which kinds of restrictions? >=20 > Oh, I did not read the GFDL in quite a years, and really have no > interest in diving and scrutinizing it again :-). =20 OK, I will not ask again. :) > More away I am from > all this, better I feel :-). Sorry, just forget I've written this > morning, I was likely in some strange mood. >=20 > I do love the FSF idea and theory, and supported the GNU project in an > intense way for maybe more than twenty years. But by now, in = practice, > I just cannot stand their slightest abuse, anymore. I'm all for > programming freedom, but this ought to include programmer freedom too! >=20 > Fran=E7ois >=20