From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: FAILED test-org/end-of-line
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:59:18 -0500
Message-ID: <4315.1354125558@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <87boei51gu.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <5557.1354050924@alphaville>
	<5875.1354052828@alphaville> <87vccp98q1.fsf@gmail.com>
	<9065.1354117890@alphaville> <871ufd9124.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87y5hl7gzn.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60435)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1Tdlux-0006ma-Tz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:59:33 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1Tdluq-0005BC-SC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:59:27 -0500
Received: from g5t0008.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.45]:39959)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1Tdluq-0005Ay-Ny
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:59:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: Message from Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
	of "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:51:56 +0100." <87y5hl7gzn.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> wrote:

> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> > Done.
> 
> I confirm that the test failed before those two changes, but passes
> after.  I am however unable at the moment to test it on any 23.x version
> of Emacs, so I don't know if that might present a regression there.
> 
> 

Given the previous problems on Windows, it would be good if somebody tested it
there as well.

Nick