From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "William Henney" Subject: minor niggles concerning tables Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:05:07 -0500 Message-ID: <41c818190706040905s2c44d931r1321ffa03773839e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HvF3Q-0002mt-J7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:05:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HvF3N-0002jg-VM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:05:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvF3N-0002jM-12 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:05:09 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.243]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HvF3M-0004JW-El for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:05:08 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c25so304785ana for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:05:08 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode Hi Carsten Every time I use org's tables I am amazed at how powerful and easy they are. There are just a couple of annoyances that I repeatedly come across, and which I thought I'd better report. * minor niggles concerning tables ** org-table-toggle-coordinate-overlays This is great, but it is less useful than it might be because it uses the notation A1, B2, etc, whereas the canonical notation (as used by org-table-eval-formula and in the TBLFM line) is @1$1, @1$2. This introduces quite a cognitive load in translating between the two, especially since one is row-major while the other is column-major. ** numbers like "1.e3" I am in the (lazy) habit of omitting the zero after the decimal point in scientific notation. This causes no problems in most programming languages, or for calc.el, but it is misinterpreted in table formulae. Is it possible to easily fix this? Cheers Will --=20 Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronom=EDa y Astrof=EDsica, Universidad Nacional Aut=F3noma de M=E9xico, Campus Morelia