From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 21:08:14 -0400
Message-ID: <4141.1336352894@alphaville>
References: <8662c9rqtq.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca>
	<87397dgg9a.fsf@gmail.com>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35622)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SRCRD-0005kR-VE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 21:08:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SRCRC-0001wJ-3U
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 21:08:31 -0400
Received: from g4t0017.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.20]:3088)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SRCRB-0001hm-UT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 21:08:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
	of "Sun\, 06 May 2012 23\:18\:41 +0200." <87397dgg9a.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: =?us-ascii?Q?=3D=3Futf-8=3FQ=3FFran=3DC3=3DA7ois=3F=3D?= Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>=20
> Fran=C3=A7ois Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>=20
> > I'm not sure I'm using "# <<tag>>" correctly, but my feeling is that it
> > should stick to the following text in various Org operations.  Let's say
> > I have something like (as I think it):
>=20
> "# <<tag>>" is a deprecated construct. I suggest to avoid bothering with
> it.
>=20
>=20

With all due respect, that is not a satisfactory answer. I, for one (or
for two: Fran=C3=A7ois would surely appreciate it too), would appreciate a
pointer to the deprecation notice (I don't remember seeing one but that
doesn't mean much), and a pointer (if different) to whatever construct
is supposed to replace it.

Thanks,
Nick