From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rick Frankel <rick@rickster.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Slight change to asynchronous export
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:50:57 -0400
Message-ID: <40767410e019abe08b6fd8f75f795e8f@mail.rickster.com>
References: <87fvrnawes.fsf@gmail.com> <8761shs3ab.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<87txg0cw5g.fsf@gmail.com>
	<0dccb1354fae8c7a3ce2c505e436bb2e@mail.rickster.com>
	<8738njaxj3.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45792)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1VbWAz-00051P-7R
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:51:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1VbWAt-0001YP-5K
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:51:13 -0400
Received: from [204.62.15.78] (port=45767 helo=mail.rickster.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1VbWAt-0001YH-01
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:51:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8738njaxj3.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 2013-10-30 06:00, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Helo,
> For reference, here is the suggested patch.
> 
> Is there any strong point against it?

looks great to me.

rick