From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [BUG] LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS not working Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:20:03 -0500 Message-ID: <4074.1331158803@alphaville> References: <5236.1331001737@alphaville> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40414) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5PDM-0008Qc-R9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:20:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5PDL-0006qo-0Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:20:08 -0500 Received: from g1t0028.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.35]:13265) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5PDK-0006or-RU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:20:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message from suvayu ali of "Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:11:01 +0100." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: suvayu ali Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, org-mode mailing list suvayu ali wrote: > Hi Nick, > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 03:42, Nick Dokos wrote: > > I don't think it's a regression - at least I could only find two commits > > that touched the relevant code (lines 1397-1405 in org-latex.el) and > > they are from 2008 and 2009. > > > > Also the latex syntax is > > > > \documentclass[a4paper]{article} > > Now I am embarrassed. :-| You are correct, I misread the latex > documentation and I didn't check the org manual before reporting. > That's what I get for sending emails after 3:00 AM. :-/ > Actually, I think the manual is deficient in this case: you have to infer the proper format from an example in the beamer section (which is not even the section where LaTeX_CLASS_OPTIONS is defined): that's better than no example at all, but I think it would be better to add an example in section 12.6.2, "Header and sectioning structure". I would encourage you to submit a doc patch. > Extremely sorry about the mix up. > Nothing to be sorry or embarrassed about. We are all mistakes and we make humans :-) Nick