From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: Re: Org-mode version 4.62 released
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:20:18 +0100
Message-ID: <3da5b54254acb9945f4e561f2562c6e4@science.uva.nl>
References: <cad52705e9f767b07eb6b2b32efcf830@gmail.com>
	<m3hcucddtl.fsf@norvel.baumann-gauting.site>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HAmXg-0004E5-Qb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:20:24 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HAmXf-0004Ds-W1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:20:24 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HAmXf-0004Dp-PJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:20:23 -0500
Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HAmXf-0003M0-Fx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:20:23 -0500
In-Reply-To: <m3hcucddtl.fsf@norvel.baumann-gauting.site>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Thomas Baumann <dtbaumann@yahoo.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On Jan 27, 2007, at 10:22, Thomas Baumann wrote:

> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Details about the changes to the spreadsheet
>> ============================================
>>
>>    - It is now much easier to assign formulas to individual fields.
>>      In particular, the field does not have to be a named field
>>      anymore. Just type an equation preceeded by "=:" and it will be
>>      defined for the current field only.
>>
>
> Hi Carsten,
>
> should the assignment be ":=" as in Pascal? This is how it works in 
> the tables
> but the docs say "=:"

Yes, this is a typo in the doc, thanks.

>
> I like this feature a lot, will the next step be a A1..B4 reference?

Its there, only has to be written like @1$1..@2$4

- Carsten