From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tim O'Callaghan" Subject: Re: emacs IDE and org Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 18:31:22 +0200 Message-ID: <3d6808890805090931o8c731d7u20a9344d0f5235f8@mail.gmail.com> References: <41DF74B043F8694186F5CC610060065F22935F@srv060fssmx.ssd.fsi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JuVVF-0008Lw-9z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2008 12:31:25 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JuVVE-0008Lg-Ol for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2008 12:31:24 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48851 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JuVVE-0008Ld-ID for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2008 12:31:24 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]:57147) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JuVVE-0000DY-2D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2008 12:31:24 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1189958fgb.30 for ; Fri, 09 May 2008 09:31:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <41DF74B043F8694186F5CC610060065F22935F@srv060fssmx.ssd.fsi.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode mailing list 2008/5/9 Rockefeller, Harry : > Is anyone using org mode in a software development process? An IDE, emacs is > no exception, assumes the source code is primary, having tools and methods > to edit source code files but not org files. org files, however, appear to > have all those other features desired in a development process: todo items, > requirements specifications, reference links, tabular and spreadsheet data, > etc. Export of various parts of the org file at different times of > development may coincide with software process milestones. > > I use Emacs for development, and have used Org to group together file links and notes for various projects. > > Org to source code seems straight forward via QUOTE, for example. From > source to org may be set up using special 'org import' markers such as > > //* Top item > > // bla bla > > //** Sub item > > // bla bla > > where the cpp source comment character may get snipped off to use source to > generate an org file. Either the source or the org file may be primary. Or > maybe the org file is primary early in this process and eventually is > replaced by source toward the end? > This sounds a bit like you want to use org for something like "Literate Programming"? Tim.