From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:35:38 +0200 Message-ID: <3E3E058D-6BBD-4D9B-845D-3E13235EF0DC@gmail.com> References: <86sk7gooh2.fsf@portan.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nwx99-0003gk-UJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:35:47 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48783 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nwx97-0003fH-OY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:35:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nwx94-0006Vg-SY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:35:45 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com ([209.85.219.218]:41753) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nwx94-0006V7-BO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:35:42 -0400 Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so13109ewy.32 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:35:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86sk7gooh2.fsf@portan.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Chris Gray Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Mar 31, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Chris Gray wrote: > Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> * =org-export-latex-classes= no longer should be customized for >> packages > >> The HEADER part of this variable should now only contain the >> documentclass macro, nothing else - at least normally. All the >> package calls via usepackage should go into >> org-export-latex-packages-alist. I moved all the default packages >> that into a new variable org-export-latex-default-packages-alist. >> This will allow me to add more packages (as needed) in the >> future, withour requiring you to erase and then redo your >> configuration of org-export-latex-classes. > >> So if you have customized this variable, please remove once more >> (hopefully for the last time) your customization, so that it can >> revert to its now much simpler default value. Put all your >> package definitions into org-export-latex-packages-alist. >> I hope this works, and we will not get conflicts because of the >> sequence in which packages are called. If there are problems, >> please let me know so that we can find a solution. > > Is it sufficient to change the variable that is being set from > org-export-latex-classes to org-export-latex-default-packages- > alist? Or > does the format of the list change at all? org-export-latex-default-packages-alist has the same format as org- export-latex-pakcages-alist. And I am filling org-export-latex- default-packages-alist already with the correct set of default packages, so you should not touch that variable. Only if you have previously customized org-export-latex-classes in order to add more usepackage statements, then you should remove your customization of that variable and list your set of additional packages in org-export-latex-packages-alist instead. Am I making sense? Thanks. - Carsten